人總需要勇敢生存, 我還是重新許願.
Carry On Till Tomorrow
In younger days, I told myself my life would be my own
And I'd leave the place where sunshine never shone
For my life's too short for waiting when I see the rising sun
Then I know again that I must carry on
Carry on till tomorow, there's no reason to look back
Carry on, carry on, carry on
Beyond the shadows of the clouds and onward to the sky
Carry on till I find the rainbow's end
For my life's too short for waiting when I see the rising sun
Then I know again that I must carry on
Carry on till tomorow, there's no reason to look back
Carry on, carry on, carry on
Drifting on the wings of freedom, leave this stormy day
And we'll ride to tomorrow's golden fields
For my life's too short for waiting when I see the rising sun
Then I know again that I must carry on
Carry on, carry on, carry on
And when the heavy journey's done, I'll rest my weary head
For the world and it's colours will be mine
For my life's too short for waiting when I see the setting sun
Then I know again that I must carry on
Carry on till tomorow, there's no reason to look back
Carry on, carry on, carry on
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
bloggers ethics Vs speech freedom
Bloggers beware
28 September 2005
Straits Times
English
(c) 2005 Singapore Press Holdings Limited
SO junior college students drunk on cyber-freedom and hotheads with strong opinions about ethnicity have been held to account for certain of their Internet postings. If a random trawl was done here of chatlines and Net journals known to the trade as blogs, there will be unamused frowns, if not warning lights flashing. Granted, most bloggers are having a lark - the more agitated the content and language, the more empowered they feel. But they should know the rules of play. In America, an airline stewardess was sacked for satirical things she wrote about her employer, Delta Airlines. Business- Week's cover story on Microsoft's loss of key personnel to rivals like Google mentions a staff blogger, who apparently is inside enemy No. 1 for his running commentaries judged to be injurious to the company's interests. The blogger knows he will be dismissed if his identity is uncovered.
On the revolution sweeping news-gathering, lame stream media is the derisive label given to mainstream media which do not adjust to the 'power shift' wrought by blog culture. It is clear: The reach of the blog is crossing boundaries beyond its original purpose of personal expression.
All this says that blogging is not terra incognita, if this is what Singaporean hobbyist-bloggers think the medium is. There are laws and conventions to observe, just as e-mail and letters to the editor are so governed. Here, as in other jurisdictions, the law of defamation should be every Net propagator's watchword. They would do well to understand the Computer Misuse Act. The case of the three persons charged with posting inflammatory remarks about Muslims will have alerted bloggers to an especial sensitivity that is not to be trifled with in a multicultural setting. If the intrinsic weakness of Net freedom is that many 'liberationists' are not fully aware of legal restraints and conventional pitfalls, it would be a straightforward matter of educating them. Internet service providers, schools and the media are the appropriate conduits for it. Showing good taste and a sense of appropriateness as a means of advancing the use of blogs for public discourse and ideas dissemination - even social mobilisation and marketing - requires time. A culture with its known parameters has to develop quickly as blogging is an unstoppable medium. This implies it can be misused.
28 September 2005
Straits Times
English
(c) 2005 Singapore Press Holdings Limited
SO junior college students drunk on cyber-freedom and hotheads with strong opinions about ethnicity have been held to account for certain of their Internet postings. If a random trawl was done here of chatlines and Net journals known to the trade as blogs, there will be unamused frowns, if not warning lights flashing. Granted, most bloggers are having a lark - the more agitated the content and language, the more empowered they feel. But they should know the rules of play. In America, an airline stewardess was sacked for satirical things she wrote about her employer, Delta Airlines. Business- Week's cover story on Microsoft's loss of key personnel to rivals like Google mentions a staff blogger, who apparently is inside enemy No. 1 for his running commentaries judged to be injurious to the company's interests. The blogger knows he will be dismissed if his identity is uncovered.
On the revolution sweeping news-gathering, lame stream media is the derisive label given to mainstream media which do not adjust to the 'power shift' wrought by blog culture. It is clear: The reach of the blog is crossing boundaries beyond its original purpose of personal expression.
All this says that blogging is not terra incognita, if this is what Singaporean hobbyist-bloggers think the medium is. There are laws and conventions to observe, just as e-mail and letters to the editor are so governed. Here, as in other jurisdictions, the law of defamation should be every Net propagator's watchword. They would do well to understand the Computer Misuse Act. The case of the three persons charged with posting inflammatory remarks about Muslims will have alerted bloggers to an especial sensitivity that is not to be trifled with in a multicultural setting. If the intrinsic weakness of Net freedom is that many 'liberationists' are not fully aware of legal restraints and conventional pitfalls, it would be a straightforward matter of educating them. Internet service providers, schools and the media are the appropriate conduits for it. Showing good taste and a sense of appropriateness as a means of advancing the use of blogs for public discourse and ideas dissemination - even social mobilisation and marketing - requires time. A culture with its known parameters has to develop quickly as blogging is an unstoppable medium. This implies it can be misused.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Porn? No, blogs bug me more
Carl Skadian , fatherhood
28 September 2005
Straits Times
English(c) 2005 Singapore Press Holdings Limited
With inaccurate and inflammatory postings on the Internet, how do we keep kids from believing everything they read?
THE past few weeks have thrown up another worry about children and the Internet, as if parents don't have enough on their hands.
I'm talking about blogs.
As a journalist, I'm naturally wary of blogs already, mainly because bloggers are wont to throw accuracy out the window.
That's because checking facts seems to be the last thing on bloggers' minds unlike, say, mainstream publications which, for the most part, do their darnedest to make sure what they publish is accurate.
For bloggers, saying what they feel like saying seems to be de rigueur, consequences be damned.
Now, blogs have generated much controversy, but what happened here about two weeks ago takes the cake.
Just in case you missed it: Three people were charged with making racist comments in their blogs. They allegedly made seditious and inflammatory remarks about Malays and Muslims.
In one particularly galling incident, one among the three allegedly admitted to being 'extremely racist' in one of his entries online.
That just about did it for me and blogs.
I'm glad the authorities hauled the trio to court. Hopefully, doing so will send a message to like-minded folk in cyberspace that they'd better start putting the brain before the mouse.
As far as I'm concerned, blogs are possibly the worst things about the Internet. Sure, pornography and other stuff rightly furrow the brows of parents, but the things some bloggers say go far beyond the pale.
As far as I'm concerned, blogs are possibly the worst things about the Internet. Sure, pornography and other stuff rightly furrow the brows of parents, but the things some bloggers say go far beyond the pale.
I have read some of these comments, chiefly because some sane members of the public occasionally e-mail such views to us, to raise a red flag about what goes on out there.
Frankly, some of the blog entries just beggar belief. The amount of vitriol being spewed by some of these chaps will leave you speechless. And all the talk about self-regulating is just so much bull to me. You read about cases where people are forced to shut down their blogs because they get a stream of invective from folks who don't agree with what they say.
Frankly, some of the blog entries just beggar belief. The amount of vitriol being spewed by some of these chaps will leave you speechless. And all the talk about self-regulating is just so much bull to me. You read about cases where people are forced to shut down their blogs because they get a stream of invective from folks who don't agree with what they say.
But there are many more blogs which encourage like-minded people to come forward and pour petrol on the fire.
Then there's the curiosity factor. The Sarong Party Girl blogger was one. She might have toiled in relative obscurity for a while, but once the word got out, the hits just kept on coming.
In the case of the three charged under the Sedition Act, there was worse to come.
In the case of the three charged under the Sedition Act, there was worse to come.
After news of the charges broke, some members of the blogging community made comments that seemed far from the realm of common sense to me.
Here were three people charged with making inflammatory statements - in a society where being tolerant is constantly drummed into us, no less - and other bloggers were worried about what the incidents bode for freedom of speech.
They were alarmed that the arrests meant there was some campaign afoot to curtail what one could say online.
They had got to be joking. I wonder where it says that freedom of speech means one can go around irresponsibly taking potshots at everyone one dislikes, with a medium which has probably the widest reach of all.
Sure, you might have the freedom to say what you want, but it comes with responsibility and accountability. Many of the bloggers I have come across have neither.
As I said, blogging, to me, is the biggest danger out there. It's also given me more work to do when it comes to my children.
Now, I have to find a way to keep my kids from believing what they read when they come across such blogs.
My children are part Chinese, part Indian and part Eurasian. Plus, they have relatives whose faiths are a whole spectrum, from Roman Catholic to Muslim.
Already, they're asking some hard questions about the state of the world today, especially when it comes to acts of terrorism that have been committed since 9/11.
Sometimes, without thinking, they mouth certain things after reading or watching a news item that I then have to catch.With all these influences around them these days, irresponsible blogs are not going to help.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to the worried parents, regardless of the contents of the blogs, is your responsibilities to educate your children to judge what is right or wrong. And, is also your responsibilities to teach your children to become an ethical and responsible blogger.
Thursday, September 22, 2005
birthday
| Your Birthdate: January 23 |
 With a birthday on the 23rd of the month (5 energy) you are inclined to work well with people and enjoy them. You are talented and versatile, very good at presenting ideas. You may have a tendency to get itchy feet at times and need change and travel. You tend to be very progressive, imaginative and adaptable. Your mind is quick, clever and analytical. A restlessness in your nature may make you a bit impatient and easily bored with routine. You may have a tendency to shirk responsibility. Very sociable, you make friends easily and you are an excellent traveling companion. |
My fellow friends, what do you think about this?
Assessment ? ? ?
Well, is quite tiring actually.
Started from 8am and altogether i had accomplised 4 different tasks.
a) competency based interview
why all the employers like to ask these kind of questions? "give me a situation where you need to work in a team and achieve a goal", "give me a situation you handle conflicts" and bla bla bla. having not too much of real life experience, i still can manage the questions and satisfy them with various experiences during high school, university and work. Sorry to say that, come to a certain point i have to 老作 and come out with something.
b) case study
well, i am always not good in writing. even if you give me an hour to prepare for a new product launching proposal, my writing skills is still not superb.
c) presentation
turn yourself into a business consultant, recommend something to your client. 45 minutes of preparation time and 20 minutes of presentation. 口窒和詞窮的情況在所難免.
d) last but not least, group exercise
6 people having a round table meeting with 4 assessors sitting around you to see how you perform in a meeting. looks like putting up a show.
The whole process ended at 1.05pm with 1 or 2 five minutes break in between which was sufficient for me to grab some bites of sandwiches (they provided refreshments). there were 12 candidates in this morning session, adding the afternoon and the tomorrow sessions, at least i will have to compete with 47 candidates. well, i would say i am quite satisfy to reach this stage
and no doubt, i already gained such a good experience from here.
Started from 8am and altogether i had accomplised 4 different tasks.
a) competency based interview
why all the employers like to ask these kind of questions? "give me a situation where you need to work in a team and achieve a goal", "give me a situation you handle conflicts" and bla bla bla. having not too much of real life experience, i still can manage the questions and satisfy them with various experiences during high school, university and work. Sorry to say that, come to a certain point i have to 老作 and come out with something.
b) case study
well, i am always not good in writing. even if you give me an hour to prepare for a new product launching proposal, my writing skills is still not superb.
c) presentation
turn yourself into a business consultant, recommend something to your client. 45 minutes of preparation time and 20 minutes of presentation. 口窒和詞窮的情況在所難免.
d) last but not least, group exercise
6 people having a round table meeting with 4 assessors sitting around you to see how you perform in a meeting. looks like putting up a show.
The whole process ended at 1.05pm with 1 or 2 five minutes break in between which was sufficient for me to grab some bites of sandwiches (they provided refreshments). there were 12 candidates in this morning session, adding the afternoon and the tomorrow sessions, at least i will have to compete with 47 candidates. well, i would say i am quite satisfy to reach this stage
and no doubt, i already gained such a good experience from here.
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
Next assessment
"You have been shortlisted for the next assessment activity which is scheduled on 22 September 2005 (Thursday) from 8.00 am to 1.00 pm.
The purpose of this 2nd assessment is to allow us to have a comprehensive view of your strengths and development needs in relation to our Programme.
As this is an important selection criteria for us, you are expected to perform your best. Your only preparation before the day is making sure that you are well rested, and able to focus your attention on the tasks at hand."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)