The virtual identity

There is this intersting entry written by A from my multiply circle:

[07:05:11 PM] A: who is baileylatte ?
[07:05:20 PM] B: sookyee + shawn
[07:05:34 PM] A: 2 in 1?
[07:05:35 PM] B: shawn also got a separate shawn
[07:05:47 PM] B: so they got 3, sookyee, bl, shawn

From that moment on, I thought that is the truth, until 5 minutes ago. B MSN me -

[07:00:56 PM] B: amkuk
[07:02:32 PM] B: i have been thinking "baileylatte" as the joint account of shawn+sookyee, only recently i know is YY
[07:02:52 PM] B: http://twomoles.multiply.com/journal/item/19 that time you know they are not "top two girls" or not?
[07:04:06 PM] B: why the hell YY's page only put shawn+sookyee photo~!!!!?????
[07:44:24 PM] A: YY?
[07:44:34 PM] A: someone told me it is shawn+sookyee
[07:44:45 PM] B: maybe i told you
[07:45:12 PM] B: she is definitely YY, she even has her own blog http://baileylatte.blogspot.com/
[07:46:35 PM] B: http://baileylatte.blogspot.com/2006/04/blog-post_20.html 10/04 monday sookyee impossible in kl
[07:50:28 PM] B: http://baileylatte.blogspot.com/2006/03/blog-post_09.html
[07:50:33 PM] B: this is the ultimate proof
[07:51:27 PM] B: i really very shameful, wanna delete the message liao
[07:53:37 PM] A: [PASTED THE CONVERSATION ON January 14, 2006]
[07:53:58 PM] B: ha ha ha, sorry
[07:54:37 PM] B: i judge from the picture of baileylatte multiply, no one inform me true identity
[07:55:04 PM] B: i start to suspect after reading baileylatte blogspot. because inconsistent with sookyee's life... baileylatte drives every day to work
[07:55:40 PM] B: and passing rawang to sungai buloh
[07:56:11 PM] B: i remember sookyee telling feisow she won't drive because owning a car in singapore is more expensive than taking taxi go work back home every day...
[07:57:21 PM] B: also, baileylatte went china a few months ago and say "the first time i go china", this is impossible for sookyee
[07:58:33 PM] A: even if sookyee drives, she cannot pass rawang to sungai buloh
[07:58:43 PM] B: yeah... sorry man...
[07:59:05 PM] B: i only read whole baileylatte last weekend
[07:59:12 PM] A: I'll write a blog on this
[07:59:21 PM] B: oh no~!!!!!
[07:59:23 PM] B: ok ok ok
[07:59:31 PM] B: write it, ha ha ha ha
[08:00:33 PM] B: first impression of baileylatte's "shawn+sookyee" photos killed me
[08:00:58 PM] B: even imagine shawn like bailey sookyee like latte
[08:01:17 PM] B: or sookyee like bailey shawn like latte
[08:02:02 PM] A: better based what you say on fact, not what you think
[08:02:11 PM] A: i am sorry man

here are the comments for the blog:
hainien wrote on Apr 25
At first I thought the same too, that Baileylatte is Shawn + Sook Yee... But I also suspected it's YY. I dropped a message at her blog, but she never confirm with me who she is... But after browsing through her blogspot...i kinda confirm it's her...
So thoau, don't feel so bad... you're not the only one. Just so happen I wasn't Sook Yee's fan club committee,

twomoles wrote on Apr 25
Being a close friend to 'true' baileylatte and the "latte" of the 'misunderstood' baileylatte, I couldnt help laughing.... muahahahaha....

why the hell that sookyee & shawn need a joint account in Multiply?

Never know that i had created such a doubt to my friends. Well, i wonder when the 2 of them get puzzle about baileylatte's identity. Is it from when i took away my display headshot of the bailey bottle?

Same reactions as twomoles, i couldnt stop laughing when i saw this and were quite impressed on how they look for evidence to proof baileylatte is actually not sookyee+shawn from my blog. Ya, sookyess wouldnt be around on 10 April to have BBQ neither drive to work everyday. But i wanted to point out that, i dont get through Rawang & Sungai Buloh either. Rawang & Sg Buloh only appeared in my CNY entry once.

Ok, about the major misleading point "YY's page only put shawn+sookyee photo", thanks to the the great function of Multiply where you can choose who can access your photo albums. No doubt shawn & sookyess ROM photos were the 1st album i uploaded, followed by that i did upload other pictures which may not too relevant to the 2 of them, hence caused the misunderstanding.

Indeed, this is interesting.